I looked at a review from the magazine Subshot. It wasn't a film magazine but I wanted to look at other types of magazine to get a wider variety of inspiration. By looking at different types of magazine it made me realise what was conventions of film reviews, or just reviews in general. I knew it was typical to have a snap shot of the film in the review, but that was specific to film reviews but it was necessary to have a picture of something on the review.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(21)
-
▼
January
(20)
- FILM: Research into target audience
- FILM: Developing a pitch
- FILM: Scripting
- FILM: Storyboard
- FILM: Organising locations actors etc
- FILM: Shooting schedule
- FILM: Researching other short films
- POSTER: Analysing conventions of film posters
- POSTER: Pitching ideas for posters
- POSTER: Sketching possible images/fonts
- POSTER: Setting up mise en scene
- POSTER: Exploring fonts
- POSTER: Choosing most appropriate images
- POSTER: Drafting/ Editing
- REVIEW: Researching different film magazine audiences
- REVIEW: Anaylising design & language conventions o...
- REVIEW: Drafting text
- REVIEW: Choosing most appropriate images from film
- REVIEW: Drafting layout
- REVIEW: Editing final product
-
▼
January
(20)
Tuesday, 26 January 2010
REVIEW: Anaylising design & language conventions of magazine reviews
I looked at a review from the magazine Subshot. It wasn't a film magazine but I wanted to look at other types of magazine to get a wider variety of inspiration. By looking at different types of magazine it made me realise what was conventions of film reviews, or just reviews in general. I knew it was typical to have a snap shot of the film in the review, but that was specific to film reviews but it was necessary to have a picture of something on the review.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment